Urging our nation's leaders to end hunger
 

The Truth About Food Stamps

The Food Stamp Program (FSP) is our nation’s first defense against hunger. Like many programs for the poor, it comes under much scrutiny, especially when it seems that recipients are not using their benefits wisely. These are our tax dollars, people argue; we don’t this money wasted. The FSP, however, is very efficient and effective program, and it is a vital safety net for the poorest people in this country. Many myths about this program persist, though, so let’s set the record straight.

 The Food Stamp Program increases food purchasing power of poor people.
Participating households enjoy greater food and protein availability than eligible households who do not participate. Some studies show that participating households consume more vitamins and minerals, but the evidence for this is weaker (1).

It would be nice to think that people who receive food stamps purchase only healthy, wholesome foods.  However, one of the benefits of this program is that it allows participants to make their own decisions about food. This independence is important for maintaining autonomy and dignity for poor families. Also, healthy foods like fruits and vegetables cost more than processed goods that are often high in sugar and fat. With the average monthly food stamp benefit hovering around $1 per meal for each person in the household, buying healthy food is challenging.

Half of all FSP participants are children. Eight percent are elderly. Around 16% of households who receive food stamps have at least one member who is disabled. Nearly all households who participate in the program live below the poverty line. Two out of five of these households earn incomes that reach less than half of the poverty line. The FSP average participant has countable resources (including bank accounts and some non-excludable vehicles) totaling $137. Only U.S.citizens and some permanent residents are eligible (2).

What all these statistics mean is that food stamps are reaching the poorest people in our country, and those who are most vulnerable to food insecurity. With low incomes and few resources to fall back on, these households depend on food stamps to ensure that they can feed their families.

FSP benefits can only be used for food purchases. Benefits can not be used for cigarettes, alcohol, or pet foods. Te electronic benefit card, which has replaced the old paper stamps, creates an electronic record and reduced improper use of FSP benefits.

The FSP is more efficient than ever. Of households receiving food stamp benefits, 98% are eligible. And of all the errors reported in the FSP, two-thirds are the result of caseworker errors, not participant misinformation. The overwhelming majority of overpayments went to very poor households, and did not even push these families over the poverty line.

The Food Stamp Program ensures that the poorest households in our country can buy food. The program continues to improve in efficiency, and it is our hope that we use the 2007 Farm Bill as an opportunity to strengthen and expand this important safety net. We are one of the richest nations in the world, and we can certainly afford to help our poorest citizens buy the food they need.

Soures:
1. Fox, Mary K., William Hamilton, and Biing-Hwan Lin. ""Effects of Food Assistance and Nutrition Programs on Nutrition and Health: Executive Summary of the Literature Review, Volume 4". Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report, No. (FANRR 1904). December 2004
2. "Characteristics of Food Stamp Households, Fiscal Year 2005." Food and Nutrtion Services, Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation. Sept. 2006
3. "GAO Finds Food Stamp Program Improving." http://harkin.senate.gov/news.cfm?id=237281

 

« Why the Farm Bill? Finding True Love While Ending Hunger »

Comments

I did a food stamp study to see if there are any food stamp skyrockets linked to auto insurance laws and there are plenty.
I also pushed for a survey in Montana that indicated 18 of 96 food stamp applicants listed DUI, Traffic fines, or auto insurance as a reason for applying for food stamps. There are 70,000 Montanans who can go on food stamps if they have a sudden 300$ expense of A DUI school, delinquent traffic fine, or mandatory auto insurance cost.
When are they going to find out more on this? What good is it to force an indigent to pay 300$ for auto insurance and then have him collect 300$ of food stamps. Why don't the put the insurance agency in the courthouse to make the trip shorter from the Insurance agency to the welfare office???????

My food stamp study linking auto insurance purchase to food stamp skyrockets is available on www.foodstampstudy.com

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d945753ef00d834e3c93553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Truth About Food Stamps:

Stay Connected

Bread for the World