Urging our nation's leaders to end hunger

Beyond Haiti's Emergency

Haiti girl Before the calamitous earthquake, Haiti was in the news for another tremor: the global food crisis of 2008.

Shortages of rice and the resulting high prices had poor Haitians foraging through dumps and eating concoctions called “mud pies,” mixtures of grain and dirt. That misery prompted the masses to take to the streets in protest, which led to a government shake-up.

Now, as emergency food aid rushes into the country to relieve the misery of people dislocated from the earthquake, it is time to also deal with Haiti’s chronic hunger and malnutrition.

The clamor is rising that the phrase “building back better” also needs to include Haiti’s agriculture system. The United Nations issued a “flash,” or emergency, appeal for $575 million to help rebuild the country after the earthquake. Fortunately, the world has responded with a flood of money. But the U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization says its part of the appeal -- $23 million to help revive Haiti’s food production -- is being largely ignored. Only 8% has been funded.

Reviving the agriculture sector is key to weaning the country off post-earthquake food aid. “The immediate priority is support for the farm season that begins in March and accounts for more than 60% of food production,” warns FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf.

Reviving the agriculture sector is key to weaning the country off post-earthquake food aid. “The immediate priority is support for the farm season that begins in March and accounts for more than 60% of food production,” warns FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf.

But seeds, fertilizers and tools to help Haitian farmers plant are largely absent from the emergency aid. “We are alarmed at the lack of support to the agricultural component,” Diouf says.

Lack of support to agriculture throughout the developing world has been a dire lament for the past three decades.

Haiti’s recent history illuminates an oft-overlooked reality of global hunger: the vast majority of today’s hungry are far from the crisis hotspots and the cameras that flock to them. Instead, their hunger is a chronic, everyday grind. For them, every day is a food emergency.

Haiti’s food crisis in 2008 was hastened by tropical storms that damaged its main agriculture area. But the longer-term drop in food production since the 1980s is less an act of God as it is an act of man. Namely, man’s flawed theories of economic development.

Haiti crowd In the era of cheap food that reigned for a couple of decades until the commodity price spikes in 2008, the theory of “comparative advantage” held that poor countries were better off buying their food from the U.S. and other big producers rather than growing it themselves. The peasant farmers of the poor countries could instead work in factories, like in the textile industry where those countries had a low-wage advantage; the money earned from the factory exports would then be used to buy food. If a hunger crisis arose, food aid would flow in; the world had plenty of excess grain.

The food crisis of 2008 exposed the folly of this theory. Higher prices, caused in one measure by dwindling global surpluses, meant those export earnings bought less food. And the higher prices also made food aid more expensive. Hunger spread. People rioted.

In June 2008, Joel Millman and I wrote in The Wall Street Journal:

 “For decades, poor nations were discouraged from investing too much in agriculture, which was seen as a problem rather than a solution to fighting poverty. Many free-market economists came to believe that the reason billions of people are poor is because they are shackled to subsistence farming. The economists’ solution: find something else for them in manufacturing, tourism or services so that they can make money to buy food instead of growing it.

“Poor countries were discouraged from growing much of their own staples, such as rice and wheat, that are usually grown more cheaply in rich countries. Instead, they were told to focus on export crops that might fetch a higher price.”

In Haiti, farmers had stopped growing rice and instead drifted to factories making things like underwear. Food production plummeted, but as long as prices remained low, the country could import what food it needed. Haitians who clamored for food self-sufficiency went unheeded. “In all my years that we asked for help, the answer was: No. Agriculture is not a tool for development,” former Haitian agriculture minister Philippe Mathieu told Millman amid the 2008 crisis.

Urged to redirect spending from local farming to areas like assembling underwear for export, Haiti’s governments rarely spent as much as 3% of the country’s annual economic output on food production.

As a result, much cheaper U.S. rice slowly displaced local rice. In the mid-1980s, the Artibonite River valley, known as Haiti’s rice bowl, produced more than 100,000 metric tons of rice. By 2003, the Artibonite was producing less than 80,000 metric tons of rice. Haiti became the world’s biggest importer of rice -- it imported about 400,000 tons in 2007 -- and the number four market for U.S. rice growers.

The food crisis prompted both donors and recipients of aid to rethink doctrines about the role of agriculture and whether poor nations should strive to feed their own people or rely on the world’s trading system to do so.

Haiti thus becomes another test of the Obama administration’s resolve to deploy its new doctrine: Feeding the Future, a global food security initiative that aims to reduce hunger and poverty through agriculture development.

“In Haiti, we have the chance to deliver something that the global community has long declared a priority: to transition from short-term interventions to addressing the underlying causes of hunger and poverty,” writes Cheryl Mills, counselor and chief of staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

As Haiti builds from the rubble of the earthquake, a new attack on hunger can rise from the rubble of disastrous development policies of the past couple of decades.

Please see recent Huffington Post articles on Haiti's ongoing humanitarian crisis by U.S. government officials Cheryl Mills, Counselor and Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and Rajiv Shah, Administrator of USAID.

Roger Thurow’s blog post appears courtesy of the Global Food for Thought blog. Thurow, a former Wall Street Journal correspondent, is a senior fellow for Global Agriculture and Food Policy at The Chicago Council on Global Affairs.



« Wonks and Storytellers in Oregon Hunger in the News »


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Beyond Haiti's Emergency:

Stay Connected

Bread for the World