Urging our nation's leaders to end hunger
 

The Sound of (Media) Silence: USDA Study on Effectiveness of Food Stamps Missing from TV News Coverage

'Shanghai news anchor's desk' photo (c) 2007, Kenneth Lu - license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

While several major newspapers covered the USDA's new study on SNAP released April 9 which found "an average decline of 4.4 percent in the prevalence of poverty due to SNAP benefits," major television news programs largely ignored the groundbreaking study. Media Matters, a nonprofit organization that monitors the media for misinformation, found that only one television news network has mentioned the USDA study -- MSNBC.

It is disappointing to know a study that shows the effectiveness of SNAP would be ignored, when so many people living in the aftermath of the recession are avoiding food insecurity through this program. Furthermore, given the political nature of the discussion around SNAP, this study could educate the public about how the program works. The truth is that more than 46 million Americans depend on SNAP to help put food on their tables every day, and many of them are hardworking parents who want to feed their children.

Hopefully, in the future, such significant national news will make it to the airwaves. For now, I encourage you to check out these excellent news articles on SNAP, the Earned Income Tax Credit, and continue to read the Bread Blog for some top-notch content on hunger related news.

JCHOI_SMWKNDJeannie Choi is associate editor at Bread for the World.

 

 

+Learn more about SNAP.

 

« Tax Credits for Low-Income Families: Questions and Answers Heather's Story: Surviving as a Single Mom »

Comments

As a SNAP program participant, I fully agree that more should be done to sustain, maintain, & reframe the SNAP benefit system whereas participants in the program do not have to suffer undo hardship as I recently did suffer. I became unemployed in late Oct. approx. the same time I was scheduled for recertification of my SNAP benefits. For a reason that was never explained to me at all my benefits were decreased to an amount that was less than $30 per month, not ever $1.00 a day...tsk. I am single with no dependent children, but I still gotta eat(dont I ?)
My umemployment compensation was from a part-time job. After five months of what became for me
a mandatory task of standing in pantry lines, I was very tired and had also lost 10lbs. Yes, I fully support more attention being given to seniors & also children to ensure their proper nutrition, but hey we single people(women & men also)gotta eat too!

Thank you for your time & consideration,


Respectfully.

Phyllis

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d945753ef0168ea53e39b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Sound of (Media) Silence: USDA Study on Effectiveness of Food Stamps Missing from TV News Coverage:

Stay Connected

Bread for the World